Part 1: Why Testing Matters in Android Development
Real reasons developers should test — and how it helps more than it hurts
Introduction
Most Android developers know they should write tests — yet many avoid it.
Common excuses include:
-
"It slows me down."
-
"My app isn’t big enough to need tests."
-
"I don’t know where to start."
This post is here to change that mindset.
Testing isn’t a chore — it’s a productivity tool. When done right, it makes development faster, safer, and less frustrating.
This series will show you how.
The Hidden Cost of Untested Code
Picture this:
You fix a bug, ship a release, and a few days later crash reports spike. That “quick fix” accidentally broke something else.
Without tests:
-
Small changes are risky
-
Bugs go unnoticed until users complain
-
Refactoring becomes slow and stressful
With automated tests:
-
You catch regressions early
-
You can refactor confidently
-
You reduce manual testing effort
-
You write better, more maintainable code
What You Gain with Testing
1. Testing Saves Time (Long-Term)
While tests may take a few minutes to write, they save hours by:
-
Preventing repeated manual checks
-
Catching bugs before they hit production
-
Giving you confidence to refactor or scale
2. Clean Architecture Comes Naturally
When you write testable code, you’re encouraged to:
-
Use separation of concerns
-
Avoid tightly coupled components
-
Inject dependencies properly
-
Keep UI logic out of business logic
This leads to modular, scalable code — with or without tests.
3. Fewer Bugs in Production
No one likes fixing crashes under pressure.
Tests help ensure critical flows (like login, checkout, or API parsing) keep working — even as your app evolves.
The Three Pillars of Android Testing
There are three main testing categories you’ll use as an Android developer:
Type | Purpose | Where It Runs |
---|---|---|
Unit Test | Tests a single function/class (logic only) | JVM (fast) |
UI Test | Verifies real user flows (clicks, inputs) | Emulator or device |
Integration/E2E | Verifies how layers/components work together | JVM or emulator |
Each has a role.
This series will help you decide when and where to use each — with full examples.
You Don’t Need 100% Test Coverage
Testing everything is a common trap.
Focus on:
-
Logic that’s hard to verify manually
-
Critical features
-
Code that breaks often
-
Edge cases (nulls, error handling, etc.)
Smart, targeted testing is more effective than blind coverage.
Summary
Writing tests may feel like extra work — but it quickly pays off by:
-
Catching bugs earlier
-
Speeding up development
-
Giving you refactoring freedom
-
Improving app stability
-
Preparing you for team-scale collaboration
This series will show you how to apply testing in the real world — with full Kotlin code and explanations.
Next: Understanding Types of Android Tests
In Part 2, we’ll dive into:
-
Unit vs. UI vs. integration testing
-
When to use each
-
Where they fit into Android architecture
Interview Questions & Answers: Android Testing (Beginner to Advanced)
Use these for self-assessment, interviews, or team discussions.
Basics & Concepts
Q1. Why should Android apps be tested?
To ensure app stability, reduce bugs in production, enable confident refactoring, and speed up development with fewer regressions.
Q2. What are unit tests?
Unit tests check a single function or class in isolation, without real dependencies or Android framework components.
Q3. What are instrumentation tests?
Tests that run on a real or virtual Android device, often used for UI testing with frameworks like Espresso.
Q4. How do UI tests differ from unit tests?
UI tests simulate user actions (e.g., clicks, typing) on a running app, while unit tests validate internal logic without a UI.
Q5. What is the test pyramid?
A testing strategy that favors many unit tests, fewer integration tests, and even fewer full UI tests for optimal speed and coverage.
Tools & Frameworks
Q6. What is JUnit used for in Android?
JUnit provides the foundation for writing and running unit tests on the JVM.
Q7. What is Espresso in Android testing?
A UI testing framework for writing reliable tests that simulate user interactions like button clicks and screen navigation.
Q8. What is Mockito used for?
Mockito is a mocking library that allows you to replace real dependencies with fake ones to test logic in isolation.
Q9. What is an IdlingResource?
An Espresso concept used to handle asynchronous tasks by telling the test runner when the app is idle.
Q10. What is Robolectric?
A unit testing framework that allows Android SDK classes to run in the JVM, so you can test Android components without an emulator.
Architecture & Testability
Q11. How does MVVM improve testability?
MVVM separates UI logic (ViewModel) from views and data, making ViewModels easier to test with standard unit tests.
Q12. What makes code hard to test?
Tight coupling, hidden dependencies, non-deterministic behavior, or reliance on Android framework classes in business logic.
Q13. What is dependency injection and why does it matter for testing?
DI helps inject testable/fake dependencies instead of hardcoded ones, allowing logic to be tested independently of external systems.
Q14. Should you write tests for every class?
No. Prioritize testing critical business logic, unstable areas, and complex flows. Skip simple or obvious code that’s unlikely to break.
Q15. What is the role of InstantTaskExecutorRule
in testing LiveData?
It ensures that LiveData emits updates immediately during unit tests on the JVM thread.
Test Design & Best Practices
Q16. How should test names be written?
In a descriptive format like functionName_condition_expectedResult
, e.g., login_withValidCredentials_returnsSuccess()
.
Q17. What’s the difference between mocking and faking?
Mocks verify interactions and behavior (with expectations), while fakes are simple in-memory implementations.
Q18. How do you test coroutines in ViewModels?
Use runBlockingTest
or TestScope
from Kotlin coroutines test library, and fake Dispatchers via Dispatchers.setMain()
.
Q19. How can you make UI tests less flaky?
Use IdlingResources, avoid hard-coded delays, write deterministic UI interactions, and ensure stable test data.
Q20. What are signs of a bad test?
Tests that are flaky, tightly coupled to implementation details, hard to read, or don't actually assert meaningful outcomes.
Q21. How do you test error states in your app?
Simulate error conditions using mocks or fake APIs that return failures, and assert proper error UI or logic handling.
Q22. Should UI tests depend on a real server?
No. UI tests should ideally run against mocked or stubbed data to ensure consistency, speed, and repeatability.
Help Support This Series
If this post helped you:
-
Clap to recommend it to other developers
-
Follow this blog to get notified when the next part is published
-
Bookmark the Series Index to follow along
-
Leave a comment if you have questions, need help, or want to suggest topics
Comments
Post a Comment