Most Developers Build Offline-First Apps Wrong — Here's What They Miss with Room

 


When you say your app works offline… does it really?

A surprising number of Android developers proudly add “offline-first” to their app descriptions. And sure, the app opens without internet. Maybe it even loads a few screens. But dig a little deeper and it becomes clear: most offline-first implementations fall apart fast.

Why?

Because building an offline-first experience isn’t about just storing data locally. It’s about doing it intentionally, with the right structure, cleanup, and flow.
And the culprit behind most of the silent issues? Room Database. Not because Room is bad — but because it's misunderstood.

Let’s walk through some of the most common mistakes developers make when using Room in offline-first apps — and what to do instead.

Mistake 1: Saving the Entire API Response into Room

Many devs take the raw JSON response from their API and store it directly into Room entities — every field, every nested object, even things the app never uses.

Why it’s a problem:

It bloats the database, complicates migrations, and clutters your data layer with irrelevant fields.

A better way:

Store only what the app actually uses. Flatten and normalize your schema. Room is meant for structured, purposeful data — not JSON dumping.

Mistake 2: Blocking the Main Thread

Some developers still use .allowMainThreadQueries() — sometimes even in production — because “it works” or “it’s just a small query.”

Why it’s a problem:

Even tiny queries can freeze the UI on lower-end devices or under heavy load. It leads to poor UX and ANRs.

A better way:

Use suspend functions and Flow. Room has native support for Coroutines — there's no reason not to use them.

Mistake 3: Treating Room Like a Temporary Cache

Developers often store things like login state, temporary flags, or session data in Room, thinking it's just convenient.

Why it’s a problem:

Room isn’t meant for ephemeral or session-only values. It slows down unnecessary reads/writes and bloats your schema.

A better way:

Use DataStore, SharedPreferences, or in-memory structures for temp data. Save Room for long-term persistence.

Mistake 4: Ignoring Migrations

Developers sometimes update their Room schema and just increase the version number — without defining a proper migration.

Why it’s a problem:

The app crashes on update. Data loss becomes a real risk. Users suffer — silently or loudly.

A better way:

Treat migrations like any other feature. Write and test Migration objects. Use AutoMigration where possible, but don’t skip manual verification.

Mistake 5: Skipping Primary Keys

In rush to “just store the data,” developers often forget to define primary keys for their Room entities.

Why it’s a problem:

Duplicate rows. Broken updates. Join failures. A primary key isn’t optional — it’s foundational.

A better way:

Use @PrimaryKey(autoGenerate = true) or assign meaningful keys manually. Every table needs one.

Mistake 6: Designing Without Relationships

It’s common to see developers with five separate tables — all of which relate to each other — but no actual relationships defined in Room.

Why it’s a problem:

You end up manually joining and mapping data in ViewModels or Repositories. It’s messy, error-prone, and inefficient.

A better way:

Use Room’s @Relation, @Embedded, and foreign key support. Let Room handle relational mapping cleanly.

Mistake 7: Storing Everything — Forever

Offline-first doesn’t mean keeping every piece of data forever. But developers often forget to clean up.

Why it’s a problem:

Room files grow unchecked. The app becomes slower, consumes more storage, and eventually performs worse offline than it does online.

A better way:

Implement data retention policies. Clean up expired, outdated, or unused data regularly. Use WorkManager for periodic cleanup tasks.

Mistake 8: Not Testing DAO Functions

Some developers trust their DAO queries to “just work.” They might manually test them once — and move on.

Why it’s a problem:

Queries can fail silently or return incorrect data, especially after schema changes. Bugs appear months later and are hard to trace.

A better way:

Write proper unit tests for DAOs using inMemoryDatabaseBuilder. Validate your queries like you would any business logic.

Mistake 9: Skipping the Repository Pattern

In an effort to ship faster, developers sometimes wire the ViewModel directly to the DAO.

Why it’s a problem:

You lose abstraction. Your ViewModel becomes tightly coupled to Room. Testing and refactoring get harder.

A better way:

Introduce a Repository layer. Let it manage data sources (Room, network, cache) and expose clean interfaces to the UI.

Mistake 10: Expecting Room to Be Real-Time

Some developers use Room to power chat apps, notifications, or real-time dashboards.

Why it’s a problem:

Room isn’t real-time. Flow is reactive, yes — but Room doesn’t sync like Firestore or handle real-time streams gracefully.

A better way:

Use real-time tools (WebSockets, Firebase, MQTT, etc.) for live updates. Persist that data into Room as needed — but don’t expect Room to be the stream.

What Offline-First Should Look Like

When done right, an offline-first app works seamlessly — online or not. Here’s the model most successful implementations follow:

  • The UI reads only from Room

  • The network syncs with Room, not the UI

  • Temporary values stay in memory or lightweight stores

  • Migrations are handled carefully and tested

  • DAOs are tested like any other logic

Offline-first is a design philosophy.
Room is just a part of the system — not the entire system.

Final Thought

Room is fast. Room is elegant. But it’s also opinionated — and unforgiving when misused.

Building offline-first apps isn’t just about storing things locally. It’s about doing it right, maintaining consistency, performance, and user trust. And that starts with how you design and use Room.

Was This Helpful?

If you’ve seen these mistakes in your team’s code (or quietly in your own)...

  • Hit the clap button (you can tap it up to 50 times!)

  • Follow me here on Medium for more deep dives, dev mistakes, and practical guides

  • Leave a comment: What’s the most common Room mistake you’ve seen?

You’re not the only one learning.
Let’s build better — together.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jetpack Compose based Android interview and questions

What’s Jetpack Compose and its Benefits? Jetpack Compose is a modern UI toolkit recently launched by Google which is used for building native Android UI. It simplifies and accelerates the UI development with less code, Kotlin APIs, and powerful tools.  Declarative Compatible Increase development speed Concise and Idiomatic Kotlin Easy to maintain Written in Kotlin To read more, refer  to  the article:  Jetpack Compose in Android Aaaaaa
Read more

Kotlin Some important unsorted interview questions and answers

Image
  What is inline class in Kotlin and when do we need one? Provide an example.  What is inline class in Kotlin and when do we need one? Provide an example. Senior Answer Sometimes it is necessary for business logic to create a wrapper around some type. However, it introduces runtime overhead due to additional heap allocations. Moreover, if the wrapped type is primitive, the performance hit is terrible, because primitive types are usually heavily optimized by the runtime. Inline classes  provide us with a way to wrap a type, thus adding functionality and creating a new type by itself. As opposed to regular (non-inlined) wrappers, they will benefit from improved performance. This happens because the data is inlined into its usages, and object instantiation is skipped in the resulting compiled code. inline class Name ( val s : String ) { val length : Int get ( ) = s . length fun greet ( ) { println ( "Hello, $s " ) } } fun ma...
Read more

Null safety based Kotlin interview questions and answers

Image
Nullable Non Nullable Types What’s Null Safety and Nullable Types in Kotlin? What is the Elvis Operator? Kotlin puts a lot of weight behind null safety which is an approach to prevent the dreaded Null Pointer Exceptions by using nullable types which are like  String? ,  Int? ,  Float?  etc. These act as a wrapper type and can hold null values. A nullable value cannot be added to another nullable or basic type of value. To retrieve the basic types we need to use safe calls that unwrap the Nullable Types. If on unwrapping, the value is null we can choose to ignore or use a default value instead. The Elvis Operator is used to safely unwrap the value from the Nullable. It’s represented as  ?:  over the nullable type. The value on the right hand side would be used if the nullable type holds a null. var str: String ? = "JournalDev.com" var newStr = str?: "Default Value" str = null newStr = str?: "Default Value" How is  !! different from ?. in unwrappi...
Read more